Albright & Thyer (2010) A Test of Validity of the LCSW Examination: Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes
This article describes a study conducted to evaluate the validity of the Licensed Clinical Social Worker Exam (LCSW), which is considered to be a reliable measure of social workers’ professional competency. The LCSW “pass/fail” exam is administered to social workers with varied levels of education and work experience (Associate, BSW, MSW, Advanced Generalist, and Clinical)[i] and is mandatory in most jurisdictions in the USA. Administered since 1983, it is “… prepared, marketed and administered…” by the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB), with the goal to “promote consumer protection” and it is seen as, “… one of the most important assurances that a social worker possesses the competence to practice responsibly”. In their study, Albright & Thyer (2010) administered a modified version of the clinical-level practice exam to 59 MSW students who were in their first year of studies. The exam was modified so that none of the 50 questions could be seen, leaving only the 4 multiple-choice answers related to the deleted questions, visible. Students were asked to guess the right answers. Whereas, “on the basis of chance alone” 25% of the answers should have been guessed correctly”, surprisingly, the students correctly guessed 52% of the answers, raising serious doubt about the ASWB’s claim that it is “a valid assessment of competence to practice social work”. The results of their study highlight several important points about the importance of using measurements that are valid and psychometrically sound.
– Current literature is lacking in the area of licensing for social workers and social work examinations. Publishing the psychometric properties behind this measure in professional journals would generate a clearer understanding of the process undertaken and help reassure “…members of the profession who have historically been suspicious of standardized licensing tests.”
– The ASWB asserts that the LCSW is not “… created in a vacuum”, and that the individuals items included in the 11 question categories have face and content validity. However, this is not enough the ensure validity as face and content validity are subjective in nature and are not generally considered to be persuasive by social scientists (Singleton & Straits, 2010). Criterion validity would be more appropriate.[ii]
– The items on the LCSW exam stem from the responses of licensed social workers who are surveyed about the types of tasks they perform, the importance they attribute to these tasks, and the extent to which they consider the task to be a necessary skill. The ASWB ensures that each “…item undergoes a statistical and sensitivity analysis by a group of expert social work professionals”, however no mention is made about the type of analysis and no details are available publically. In addition, the assurances made by the ASWB are not questioned by members of the social work profession. Rather, they are accepted “…as a matter of faith”. Given the enormous weight attributed to the results of this test and its impact on a social worker’s professional trajectory, and considering the consumer protection objective of the exam, “… anything less than the scientific transparency provided by both internal and independently conducted and published psychometric evaluations…” is not enough.
Other concerns about the LCSW exam:
– As aforementioned, the ASWB is involved in all fundamental and implemental aspects of the LCSW exam, raising the question of Cuis custodiet ipsos custodes? “But who will guard the custodians themselves”?[iii]
– There are tremendous financial gains associated to the ASWB exam yet no financial disclosure on the part of the ASWB and this raises questions. As indicated on the Association of Social Work Boards official website, the current rate for the Clinical exam (used in this study) is $260.00 per exam. A printed study guide can be purchased for $38.00 and a practice exam is available at the cost of $85.00. In 2013, ten thousand, eight hundred and three (10,803) social workers took the exam, a total cost of $4,137,549.00. Of this group, approximately 2377 social workers (78%) did not pass the exam and had to retake it, at the full cost (approximately $618,020). The potential earnings from this clinical cohort alone were $4,755,569.00.[iv]
For the curious and daring, here are 2 sample questions from the clinical-level exam: [v]
1. A six-year-old child lives with a foster family. His father is in prison and his mother is in residential treatment for alcohol dependence. The child is small for his age, often has temper outbursts, and has difficulty completing schoolwork. The social worker notes that his speech is immature. What should the social worker do FIRST?
(A) Work with the foster parents on a behavior modification plan
(B) Suggest that the child’s teacher refer him for special education placement
(C) Refer the child for assessment for fetal alcohol syndrome
(D) Work with the child’s biological mother toward reunification
2. A social worker is conducting a first interview with a client who attempts to dominate the interview from the beginning. The client complains that his telephone is tapped, and says that his house is watched by the police. How can the social worker BEST establish a beginning level of rapport with the client?
(A) Interrupt the client to ask factual questions about his background
(B) Ask the client about the ways in which the social worker can be helpful with these problems
(C) Question the client about when he first believed that his house was being watched
(D) Ask the client to describe the evidence he has that his phone is being tapped
Answers: 1, C; 2, B
How did you do? (Phew, I passed)
[i] Association of Social Work Boards official website. Accessed on May 12, 2014 from:
[ii] Singleton Jr, R. A., & Straits, B. C. (2010). Measurement. In Approaches to social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
[iii] Yahoo Voices (2014). Ten Latin Proverbs Everyone Should Know. Accessed on May 12, 2014 from:
[iv] Association of Social Work Boards official website. Accessed on May 12, 2014 from:
[v] See iv