Ling Lunch 2/27 — Brian Buccola

When: Wednesday 2/27 1:00–2:00 pm in room 117

Who: Brian Buccola

What: A mathematical demonstration that classic Optimality Theory is expressively weaker than ordered rewrite rules

Abstract: I demonstrate mathematically that classic Optimality Theoretic grammars, consisting of just two levels of representation (underlying and surface) and of just two types of constraints (markedness and basic faithfulness), are formally expressively weaker than ordered rewrite rules. That is, under a suitable (and very generous) formalization of what phonologists intuitively consider classic OT, I prove that there are phonological patterns which can be expressed by ordered rewrite rules but which cannot be expressed by any set of classic OT constraints, under any ranking. Moreover, the type of constraint that ends up being required is precisely the type that has been proposed in extensions to classic OT.

0 Responses to “Ling Lunch 2/27 — Brian Buccola”


Comments are currently closed.
Blog authors are solely responsible for the content of the blogs listed in the directory. Neither the content of these blogs, nor the links to other web sites, are screened, approved, reviewed or endorsed by McGill University. The text and other material on these blogs are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or information of McGill.