Are you a high-tech or a low-tech reader?

iPad (credit:

Reading is one of the main activities performed by a grad student and academics in general. In my PhD program in management, i have to read between 12 and 15 papers a week for my courses this semester, let alone all other readings such as book chapters, leisure books, blogs, e-mails, tweets, facebook news feed, so forth and so on. Yes, I probably spend half of my awake time reading.

But let me focus on these 12-15 papers. Some are as small as ten pages, but some are fifty pages long; thus, let’s consider an average of twenty pages per article. That makes 300 pages of articles to read per week, about 3,500 per semester. So how should we “consume” all this information?

Last year I decided to be a “high-tech” reader, and I read all these pages on an iPad. At first I used a simple reader app (such as iBooks), but soon I realised the need of annotating on the files, so I switched to a paid app (iAnnotate PDF) that offered this capability, as well as other features such as downloading and uploading from/to Dropbox. In other words, I would download the files from my Dropbox account, read and annotate them, and finally replace the original file in Dropbox with the annotated one.

I did this for the entire year and it worked quite well. Most of all, I enjoyed the savings in printing fees (at $0.06 per page, it would have cost me about $400 for the whole year), and the storage and accessibility affordances: I could have all my readings available everywhere I was without having to carry them around. But there were downsides as well. Specially during seminars: even with tabbed browsing and a search function, retrieving information from the papers and annotations is not as quick as having all articles in printed form.

Another disadvantage was the dynamics in class. Having an iPad or a laptop usually means you spend more time interacting with the technology than with your colleagues, and even though you’re only looking at the articles or related material, it appears as if you’re multitasking and thus not focusing 100% on the discussions.

That is more or less the pile for one course...

So this semester I decided to experiment being a “low-tech” reader, and so far I have mixed feelings about both alternatives: I can’t really decide which one is better. Class dynamics did improve slightly by having papers in class and no screen. That’s because handling paper is easier in lower volumes. However, as the semester advances, the task starts to get daunting. Having 1,000 articles neatly organized in EndNote is way easier than having 20,000 pages in your drawers and shelves.

I decided to keep the experiment until the end of the semester and then make a decision on which way works better for me. Meanwhile, I’d like to know: are you a high-tech or a low-tech reader? Why?

6 responses to “Are you a high-tech or a low-tech reader?”

  1. Archi says:

    I must be a very hi-tech reader. Not for my love of technology, but the mere urge to save paper.
    It is definitely tough to read off a computer screen, is it any easier off the iPad?

  2. diego says:

    Yes, the iPad is much easier on the eyes than a regular computer screen, but the main advantage is also that you can sit on the couch or lay in the bed as opposed to the computer (it is way less cumbersome than a laptop as well).
    I’d be curious to know whether someone reads the papers on a Kindle or similar e-ink screen device. Isn’t the screen too small? How easy/difficult it is to make annotations?

  3. Rashad says:

    definitely low tech reader. I cannot concentrate on the material while reading from any device. Having my laptop in the classroom during the lecture means that I’ve simply wasted that lecture and need to go over it again.

  4. Archi says:

    I use Endnote to keep reference. All annotations are very old fashioned. I make similar notes in a common word file, or actually write things down. 🙂

    So, does that make me hi-tech (solely dependent on computers) or low-tech (do not use any dedicated software for reading)?


  5. diego says:

    Hey Archi,
    I guess you’re pretty ‘hi-tech’, considering my proposed definition of low-tech as ‘reading everything on paper’. 🙂
    But my take is that there is no better way (that’s why I started the discussion), each ‘system’ has its advantages. Then it is up to the each reader to choose the best for her/him.
    Also, re using the Kindle to use PDFs, a friend told me it is quite cumbersome: “In order to annotate, you have to email the original PDF to your Kindle/amazon email account which converts it into the Kindle format. That costs a rate based on file size. Then, you read their format and can annotate on Kindle. Since the Kindle doesn’t have a touch screen, I imagine it to be challenging.”
    Another one commented that “as Kindle is primarily designed for ebook formats, when I transfer a pdf into Kindle, readability becomes an issue.”
    Thanks for the discussion, everyone!

  6. Mario says:

    I’m still not on the ipad era, but I see myself as a high tec reader, since I spent most of time reading articles and getting information from my laptops and iphone, I also avoid to print them and even in the company where I work now seems to be part of the culture to print everything I normally don’t do it for me and will preferably carry my laptop with me to the meeting with all the information I may need

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Blog authors are solely responsible for the content of the blogs listed in the directory. Neither the content of these blogs, nor the links to other web sites, are screened, approved, reviewed or endorsed by McGill University. The text and other material on these blogs are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or information of McGill.