Plenary Guardianship: Persons with Disabilities Made Vulnerable

By Roger Bill

 

It’s been over 2 months now since I’ve arrived in the Federal District of Mexico. The cultural shocks come less and less, my skin doesn’t burn so easily, I don’t mind the altitude when I run, and the chilangismos (local slang) roll easily off my tongue. As settled in as I feel, I’m often startled in my work by the large divide between the law on paper, and the reality in the streets.

In the day to day, this reality would be evident to any Canadian visitor like me, not just those working in human rights. Traffic laws are a great example. There are laws on the books, but what matters is what the other motorists are doing, not what colour the lights are. For example, I had a lively cab driver a couple of weeks ago. He was happy to be taking me and two friends across town for a decent fare. So, when a police officer pulled him over for running a red light and was at his window telling him he had to pay a fine and leave us to find another cab, what mattered was how quickly he could leave the police car in his tracks, not the picture of his car caught by the traffic camera.

After an adventurous flight from the police with my aggressive cabbie, I realized that what holds for cabbies holds for people with disabilities: there are laws on the books, but people will do what they can get away with.

Unfortunately for people with disabilities, the people bending the rules are their legal representatives, or public servants who don’t want to make reasonable accommodations for them, or administrators of psychiatric institutions where they are indefinitely detained.

A large part of my work in the first month of my arrival was creating this year’s Zero Project Report, a study of the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities (CRPD). The study examines not only what legislative changes have been made in Mexico to bring the law in line with the convention, but what the practical reality of the implementation of the convention is. Sadly, the reality usually falls well short of the laudable goals and aspirational language of recent legislative reforms.

Disability Rights International advocates for the rights of people with disabilities, and particularly tries to attain the ideals promised by article 19 of the CRPD: to have people live inclusively in the community rather than in isolated institutions where they suffer abuse. The organization fights to have the reality of institutions mirror the rights guaranteed by law. This is a laudable goal and I’m very happy to participate in it through our different advocacy initiatives.

Currently we are trying to end institutional abuse in a Central American psychiatric hospital through motions before the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights. The abuse is terrible: people administered therapy without their consent, others locked up for life with no possibility to review their status and live again in the community, sexual abuse, human trafficking, and horrendous living conditions. We hope to stop the terrible abuse perpetrated by the institution. However, bringing about de-institutionalization is no mean feat. Realistically things won’t change overnight, and people with disabilities can do little to help themselves when they are locked up in psychiatric wards in deplorable conditions.

So, I’m very happy to be participating in a project to empower people with disabilities and give them the tools to change the situation in the hallways of hospitals. Along with pressuring the government to improve conditions and offer community service as DRI constantly does, we are attempting to reform the laws of legal capacity in Mexico so that people with disabilities can have more control over how they live their lives.

DRI is part of a working group composed of the National Council for the Development and Inclusion of People with Disabilities (CONADIS), Rehabilitation International, several strategic litigation firms which specialize in disability rights, and other invited experts. The project aims to propose amendments to the civil code of the Federal District, as well as proposing a draft legislation creating a supported decision making scheme. Through these two changes, we hope to create a strong example for the other Mexican states to follow. It is a monumental task, and our proposal may not get adopted on its first pass in the national assembly, but it is step in the right direction.

A report by the Secretary General of the UN on the progress of efforts to ensure the full recognition and enjoyment of the human rights of persons with disabilities [A/58/181] perhaps says it best:

“The right to recognition as a person before the law is often neglected in the context of mental health. The concept of guardianship is frequently used improperly to deprive individuals with an intellectual or psychiatric disability of their legal capacity without any form of procedural safeguards. Thus, persons are deprived of their right to make some of the most important and basic decisions about their life on account of an actual or perceived disability without a fair hearing and/or periodical review by competent judicial authorities. The lack of due process guarantees may expose the individual whose capacity is at stake to several possible forms of abuse. An individual with a limited disability may be considered completely unable to make life choices independently and placed under “plenary guardianship”. Furthermore, guardianship may be improperly used to circumvent laws governing admission in mental health institutions, and the lack of a procedure for appealing or automatically reviewing decisions concerning legal incapacity could then determine the commitment of a person to an institution for life on the basis of an actual or perceived disability.”

Throughout Latin America and much of the world, the laws governing legal capacity must be reformed to protect the rights of people with disabilities. Hopefully, Mexico City can take a leadership position for the rest of the country, and eventually for other nations in Latin America.

Leave a Reply

Blog authors are solely responsible for the content of the blogs listed in the directory. Neither the content of these blogs, nor the links to other web sites, are screened, approved, reviewed or endorsed by McGill University. The text and other material on these blogs are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or information of McGill.